|
|
WANGO
CONFERENCE
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Content |
|||
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE CONFERENCE 2.1 OPENING PLENARY – presentation by Government and International Representative of NGOs 2.2 WORKSHOPS – Networking and Media workshops 2.3 2nd PLENARY – Experiences from Grassroot, National and International NGOs 2.4 ACADEMICIAN’S PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF NGOs in SOCIETY 2.5 GRANTS 2.6 CLOSING PLENARY – recommendations / resolutions and discussions on the way forward
|
|||
ANNEXES |
|||
Annex 2 – Culture of Responsibility and our role as NGOs in the 21st century by Dr. Massimo Trombin, IRFF International Field Director and President of WANGO Europe Annex 3 – Proceedings from Networking Workshop facilitated by Mr. Zaa Twalangeti of TANGO Annex 4 – Proceedings from Media Workshop facilitated by Mrs. Ananilea Nkya of TAmWA Annex 6 – List of participants
|
|||
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED |
|||
|
|
||
HEAA |
Home Economics Association for Africa |
||
NGOs |
Non Governmental Organisations |
||
TACOSODE |
Tanzania Council for Social Development |
||
TAMWA |
Tanzania Media Women’s Association |
||
TEN / MET |
Tanzania Education Network / Mtandao wa Elimu Tanzania |
||
TGNP |
Tanzania Gender
Networking Programme |
||
|
|||
2.0
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
|
|||
The first panelist Mr. Kasongwa, an Economist – Vice President’s Office talked mainly on relationships between government and NGOs in his paper entitled “Culture of responsibility and role of NGOs – Overview”. He also outlined the importance of NGOs as being close to the grassroot and more likely, if responsible, to implement their plans/activities according to set objectives. He offered that the Government sees NGOs’ role as that of providing social services and offering the platform for advocacy to which end the government recognizes the importance of umbrella organizations and other networks nationally, regional and at district level – where the Regional Administrative Secretaries, District Executive Directors or sector ministries play a vital part. He warned however that the Government expects transparency, mutual trust and information flow to be the building blocks towards mutual fulfillment of our responsibilities. It was observed that if these qualities are not adhered to or are eroded it creates suspicion and misunderstanding between NGOs and government. Mr. Kasongwa said that the Government is aware of the existence of dubious (briefcase) NGOs that do not deliver they exist on paper only but do not perform for the betterment of their target group(s) but for self-enriching. These organizations are therefore not accountable to the communities they support to serve. The government would therefore like to monitor these as well as those that perform well for future development planning and ensuring equitable resource utilization for the well being of Tanzanians. Dr. Massimo Trombin, IRFF International Field Director and President of WANGO Europe gave a background paper outlining NGO evolution, various existing scenario and looked at the impact, challenges and opportunities in relation to the “Culture of Responsibility and our role as NGOs in the 21st century” the theme of this conference. In his paper entitled “Role of NGOs in the 21st century”. The paper gave to the conference the following salient points: q What are NGOs, how they started and performed / acted all through the transition to the current setting of NGOs worldwide. q There’s a rising trend of NGOs being formed e.g. in neighbouring Kenya, 120 new organizations are being formed every year. The organizations formed are of various types depending on purpose and target group. q Support: NGOs in Africa largely depend on Western governments / donors to fund their programmes as opposed to Europe and America where governments chip in a large chunk of funds to finance NGO activities. q UN and western governments see NGOs as indispensable partners to work with since they are cheap and effective as opposed to governments. q A smaller amount of support to NGOs worldwide comes from the private sector, corporations, foundations, religious bodies and rich individuals. In the end total support is estimated at $ 6 bn – 8 bn per annum. q The challenge of evolution and work of NGO is to keep the original positive motivation and to disband once the objective has been fulfilled. Transitory measures to be taken may include avoiding competition and duplication of services / efforts. q Benefits: Millions of people worldwide are being helped through NGOs by building schools, hospitals or protecting the rights of women, children, other disadvantaged groups in society and provision of relief services in times of crisis / conflicts. They also provide an incredible source of employment / jobs (e.g. in the USA, NGOs employ more people than the federal government). q Impact: NGOs have a motivation to serve and help people (the poor), bring hope to millions of refugees, employ local people and think of long term goals that will create impact. They thus represent and raise the people’s consciousness. Moreover, NGOs give opportunity for anyone to make their contribution for the betterment of society. q Voluntary work shall be hailed by government and other development actors – since through this work the society prospers and that may even attract investors. q NGOs can also make some or large impact through promoting / supporting democratic processes in accordance with cultural practices, level of consciousness and social factors.
Dr. Massimo summed up his presentation by pointing out that responsibility will set Tanzanian NGOs free. By finding solutions to a problem(s) and act in earnest and pre-conceived deliverables. Tanzania needs to build this culture as it has intelligent and courageous people, resources and purity of heart to attain set goals.
|
|||
The most important points that emerged from the networking workshop were: q What are networks and networking – the latter being a gathering, relationship between people or organizations to cooperate in achieving certain objectives. q Benefits of networking include exchange of information, avoiding duplication and competition of service or funds, effective use of resources, building capacities and having a joint – voice. q Challenges include lack of transparency and accountability, funds mismanagement, poor structures, poor involvement of stakeholders, lack of financial support from government, poorly skilled organization and management workforce. There were only two recommendations that came out of the networking and coalition building workshop. They are request to the government to provide donations / subsidy to NGOs, and that the role of networks should further be explained among NGOs themselves in follow up meetings / conferences (participants held the view that future networks role should include offering finance to small / member organizations / groups). The media workshop was dominated by the following arguments / discussions: q The role of media in social transformation was outlined and examined. q Presentation tried to highlight the power of the media and how NGOs can work with the media. q Media has a role of ensuring that the society is well informed, educated, its citizens live peacefully, motivated in addressing various issues and is entertained. q Collaboration between media and NGOs can be achieved through lobbying the media and / or creating links with media decision-makers. q NGOs should be aware of existing media policies and have strategies for approaching them for information dissemination. q The challenge is for NGOs to keep their own records right, researching and having up-to-date / facts to back up their information / story. q How NGOs budget for the media / organization’s publicity. The only recommendation from this workshop was that media houses shall come up with a special policy to help NGOs publicize their work and access them. It was informed and argued that currently, many NGOs don’t have the resources to engage the media and this made it difficult for work / impact made by NGOs to be seen by society.
|
|||
From the grassroots we had Mr. Paul Titus, of the Shinyanga Foundation Fund who informed on a lot of issues but these emerged most: q Mostly achievements have been recorded in the fight against HIV/AIDs and environmental protection. q Challenges include communication, funds management and cooperation from local government and questions of mandate to implement certain activities at grassroot level. At the national level, we Mrs. Mary J. Mwingira, of TANGO – the umbrella body for NGOs in Tanzania. She had a lot to offer for the session but summed up by saying that the challenges facing organizations which are national in character and in operations include the perception by the central government that they are urban-based. She also said that it was difficulty to fulfill the needs of stakeholders, linkages with grassroot and media and that the existing culture does not tolerate Lobbying and Advocacy. She also pointed out lack of and sometimes inadequate solidarity and cooperation among NGOs in the country and finally the biggest challenge for all of us is how do we avoid the (donor) dependency syndrome. Dr. Massimo Trombin, of IRFF and WANGO gave his account of what is required at international level. Since this kind of organizations transcends national boundaries the following salient points shall be considered: q Use the power of Information and Communication Technology to enhance networking and communication. q Be ready to share resources – effective utilization where the organizations should be ready and able to contribute. q Build credibility of your organization.
|
|||
|
q NGO Potential: Dr. Rweyemamu cited NGOs as local contacts suited to popular participation and able to reach the poor in a cost effective, flexible manner and are creative in nature. q Challenges/Impacts: Within the NGO sector / sphere there exists little or no knowledge on evaluation practice coupled with the presence of poor data / information collection and project reporting mechanisms. q What is the way forward?: Dr. Rweyemamu signaled to invite academicians in NGO work, use their intellectual work / acumen for NGOs’ own ends. He also warned that they should only reach out those academicians who have the required information and finally begged NGOs to regard academicians as assets.
|
|||
Dr. Massimo emphasized on the following during his presentation which was well attended and had the attention of most participants to the conference: q It is time consuming and hard work to fundraise q Successful funding depends on existing or envisaged management and governance practices of the organizations q Organizations should research before submitting a proposal q After research is done they should develop a strategy taking into consideration the interest of funders / donors q While drafting the document, follow the elements of project proposal q NGOs should avoid sending scatter funding requests and should investigate the funders’ interest. q The funding strategy should be developed around programme/project purpose, target group and focus. q NGOs/CBOs need skilled personnel and commitment in fundraising q Finally NGOs should establish long term relationship with donors.
|
|||
On the recommendation to lobby the government to allocate budget funds for NGOs it was discussed at length and finally the following stages were agreed to be followed. Stages:
On the role of media in promoting the NGO sector media houses were urged to develop internal policies / guidelines to promote the work of NGOs in the country. Finally it was resolved that much as NGOs / CBOs demand greater responsibility and accountability from other stakeholders such as the government and donors, they should themselves be transparent and accountable first.
|
|||
|
|||
| Conference Objectives | Conference Schedule | Picture Gallery | TRFF Conference Report |
Copyright (c) 2003 IRFF Europe
Luxembourg@irff-europe.org